The Supreme Court is sending Donald Trump’s immunity case back to a lower court in Washington, dimming the prospect of a pre-election trial.

The breadth of Monday’s Supreme Court decision largely shields former President Trump from criminal prosecution, while raising questions about the extent future presidents can take actions that would ...

Today, Andy meditated on the question of presidential immunity. He began by noting that he: started out pretty much where Charlie is on the question of presidential immunity — the issue on which we ...

Former federal prosecutor Glenn Kirschner suggested in a Tuesday video that President Joe Biden utilize the Supreme Court’s Monday immunity ruling to prevent former President Donald Trump’s reelection ...

There is no textual basis for "immunity" as such, but there are structural reasons why some degree of insulation is inevitable. Justice Barrett's concurring opinion in Trump v. United States is more ...

President Joe Biden on Monday condemned the Supreme Court’s decision which ruled that presidents have an absolute immunity from prosecution for core official acts, and issued a stern warning over a ...

Challenging the federal prosecution stemming from his attempts to overturn the results of the 2020 election, Donald Trump argued that former presidents can be prosecuted for "official acts" only if ...

While the Supreme Court imbued the presidency with untold power, hobbled federal agency power and hollowed out the administrative state this term, it was actually amassing power to itself. In Trump v.

In one of the most anticipated rulings of the year, the Supreme Court declared that former President Trump is immune from criminal prosecution for any so-called “official act” taken as president, but ...

Now that we have a King, will someone please remind me what all that kerfuffle in 1776 was all about? I am outraged at the recent U.S. Supreme Court decision allowing cities to outlaw homelessness ...