On Friday, nearly 150 congressional Democrats signed a resolution condemning President Trump's withdrawal from the Paris Climate Accords. Since its enactment in 2016, the agreement has been controversial among conservative politicians.

Paris climate agreement is not the boogeyman that critics such as President Trump claim, but it hasn't kept the world from overheating, either. Here's a closer look.

Trump's executive order called for an immediate withdrawal from the Paris Agreement. The agreement requires one year notice, but there's room for interpretation.

President Donald Trump signed an executive order on Monday for the U.S. to withdraw from the 2015 Paris climate agreement — again. Despite his 2017 order being versed by former President Joe Biden four years later, Trump is declaring the country exits ...

Donald Trump, for a second time, has withdrawn the U.S. from the Paris Agreement, which puts us in the company of Iran, Libya and Yemen.

This is the second time Trump has pulled the U.S. out of the Paris climate agreement (Getty Images) “We continue to work relentlessly, but our resources are increasingly over-stretched,” a ...

He withdrew the U.S. from the Paris Climate Accords, putting the growth and success of American communities and families ahead of the extreme and pointless demands of climate radicals. Almost simultaneously,

The Paris agreement is a mostly voluntary climate pact originally written in ways that would both try to reduce warming and withstand the changing political winds in the United States. In his ...

It came as a surprise to nobody that one of Donald Trump's first acts on his return to the White House was to sign an executive order withdrawing the US from the Paris agreement on climate change.

The government is required under the Paris Agreement to report progress on adaptation and on contributions to reducing emissions today.

President Donald Trump had a busy first day back on the job. From his desk in the Oval Office, Trump signed executive orders on energy and regulation with major implications for Canada. He’s rejected the primacy of a regulatory state (in favour of the legislative state),